Cynical Planners - Part Next:
What goes on in the "Planning" departments of most local governments isn't what most people probably imagine - guys standing around maps with markers talking growth statistics and sensitive environmental features. It isn't even close to what is taught in planning schools - things like urban economics and how to manage planning forums and town halls where alternative futures can be debated and discussed among diverse participants.
No. Most public planning offices' chief function is to facilitate land development, not plan land use. More often that not, those employed as local government planners administer codes and ordinances. And some silly outdated ones at that. Planning offices are generally a confusing miasma of administrative paper-pushing in service to the building industry. And practicing public planners are forced into the role of developer-guide for applicants who must get through a regulatory maze of procedures and overlapping jurisdictions and regulations.
This necessary relationship between planners and developers is frequently viewed as favoritism by those outside this process. A "fix" for the process leads to a growing role for neighborhood associations in an attempt to represent and balance other interests. And good luck with that.
On top of it all are real and imagined illegitimate uses of planning powers by elected and appointed officals who may trade project approvals as political movida.
And best of all - the part that'll make a planner cry - any poor outcome of development - sprawl, traffic, loss of those sensitive environmental features or farmland - is then blamed on poor planning instead of on the far more common failure to plan or to implement plans, or on the outdated codes, the process, the movidas or developers themselves.
It's no wonder people are mad. And cynical.