Durango makes the New York Times series on federal lands. This part called Wheels in the Wild.
DURANGO, Colo. In the San Juan National Forest here, an iron rod
gate is the last barrier to the Weminuche Wilderness, a mountain
redoubt above 10,000 feet where wheels are not allowed.
But the gate has been knocked down
repeatedly, shot at and generally disregarded. Miles beyond it, a
two-track trail has been punched into the wilderness by errant
all-terrain-vehicle riders who have insisted on going their own way,
on-trail or off.
There are so many of these machines, said Dave Petersen, a bow hunter
who monitors public lands issues here in Durango for the environmental
group Trout Unlimited, it has made our big public lands much smaller,
for the wildlife and for us. (...)
T-shirt image from the The T-shirt guy.
And this sidebar from the Times story:
Groups Representing Motorized Users:
Blue Ribbon Coalition
Americans for Responsible Recreational Access
Advocates for Access to Public Lands
Ride With Respect
Utah Shared Access Alliance
Montanans for Multiple Use
Colorado Off-Highway Vehicle Coalition
Groups Seeking to Curb Off-Highway Vehicle Use on Public Lands:
Responsible Trails America
Trout Unlimited
Backcountry Hunters and Anglers
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Rangers for Responsible Recreation
Notice some imbalance? Vehicle manufacturers participate heavily in some of those motorized user groups. And it doesn't include groups like the American Motorcyclist Association or the Off-Road Business Association, where No Trails = No Sales! The Times doesn't touch on these formidable business interests in the "debates" about ATV use.
Honda seems to over-stress the functional aspects of their vehicles.
(...) On
the farm, a tractor cost exponentially more to purchase and maintain, and an
ATV uses 8 percent of the fuel necessary to feed a tractor. Consequently utility
usage exploded in the 1980s and ATVs became multi-purpose machines, serving both
recreational and utility purposes. This multi-purpose usage grew from 30 percent
of total usage in 1985 to approximately 80 percent of today's ATV market.
(...)
By the time the '90s rolled in, the Honda FourTrax had become an essential part of the great American toolbox. You'd be hard pressed to find a Louisiana rice farm, Washington apple orchard or Montana cattle ranch that didn't have at least one.
From copper mines to banana plantations, golf courses to pig farms, forest reclamation projects to shopping center maintenance, nothing on wheels had ever been as versatile, reliable, efficient and affordable, on the job or on the weekend, as the Honda ATV.
Though sport models such as Honda's FourTrax 300EX and the new-for-'99 400EX are immensely popular with sport and recreational riders, industry observers estimate that 85 percent of ATV use in the '90s revolved around some sort of enterprise. Mr. Takeuchi's idea had grown up, gone to work and done a good job.
Now let' s go play! But be careful. Here's an interesting bit about the power of ATV manufacturers from Oregon Live.
As the ATV industry's lobbyists fight to shape regulation in
Washington, D.C., its lawyers have built a solid bulwark around their
product in another arena: the courts. Injured riders once won huge
verdicts, among them a landmark $5.7 million Oregon case that went to
the U.S. Supreme Court. But that was long ago.
Many lawyers these days are reluctant to sue ATV manufacturers
because it's just too hard to prevail. The ATV companies spend heavily
to defend cases and blame the riders for accidents. Victories for
plaintiffs are rare. One big reason is the sway that
government-sanctioned ATV safety warnings carry with jurors.
Recent Comments