Interesting recent stuff in the Alibi about the Drinking Water Project by Christie Chisholm who makes a boo-boo in the early part.
The “customers” the bottle—a marketing device from the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority—refers to are the residents within Albuquerque city limits.
Touchy point since the whole reason the Authority was formed, as I posit relentlessly, was to eliminate the city's sole control of the water utility for the benefit of land developer interests represented by the county government. ::Sigh::
The Tribune commentary by Consuelo Bokum says we need water planning. How can you disagree? But the heart of the matter, or a bi-value anyway, is just how
little control local citizens have over the
situation. We'll get our hopes all up about a water plan then when it tanks we'll blame government. Perfect.
Most people probably think we should do water planning whatever it means. Many still think we should do land use planning - whatever that means. But few will stick around to get down to the big bright brass tacks - implementing even the best plans is nearly impossible.
For one thing, existing laws and practices preclude a lot of would-be solutions. Implementation often requires painstaking code amendments - difficult in local government departments decimated by the we-hate-government-decades. For another thing, government can't control or predict land use for shit. And what's a water plan without a land use component?
Land developers who pull strings have worked consistently for years to assure that land planning is marginalized. MRCOG predictions don't really reflect land use plans (that's a chicken and egg thing they'll tell ya) and the basic constructs of the original Albuquerque - Bernalillo County Comprehensive Plan have been openly mocked for years. This is in spite of many years of good work and the best intentions. And it is a long story. Stay awake.
Whether or not you personally buy-into the contention that free market forces apply or function in land development and will magically solve everything, (the land developer as wizard running a close second to favorite guise of land developer as Santa Claus), know the power of this ridiculous meme. It has handicapped planning and permanently truncated the connection between what little land use planning either the city or county may attempt from whatever is going on with the state's largest water utility - a big fat component of any water plan.
The Planned Growth Strategy, the last large scale planning effort attempted by both the City and County, galvanized opposition to planning
among the economic development crowd downtown - those who cared the most. The work threatened to base utility
fees on costs, integrate land use policy with pricing and encourage
infill - scary commie stuff like that. Easy to defeat or weaken when
existing neighborhoods are easily threatened by bad infill and no one
speaks for preserving the much more profitable to develop city edges. Profitable especially if service costs are flat or subsidized.
There was never much connection between utility and land use planning in Albuquerque's relatively short planning history. Utility decisions, like where State funds for water lines were expended in the valley, for example, followed the direction of who was in power not what any plan said should take place - even if it represented a careful choice among examined alternatives with a public advisory group over a three year process. Noooo. Papa knows best.*
With formation of the Water Authority, the authority for water was formally separated from the entities with any statutory authority over land use planning - municipal and county government. In the absence of state mandated land use planning this separation is fatal. Or certainly a kick in the groin to the idea of managing land use and water delivery together. I'm assured by the guys that this is not the case because the Authority has a resolution calling for consistency with the comprehensive plan. But it is voluntary. So big whoop.
With the quiet subterfuge and all that government-blaming and squealing about private property
rights we can be forgiven for forgetting who pays in the end for
not planning. The fictional free market isn't free, it requires
extending
roads and public services willy nilly out to the Puerco for every tom
dick and hairy development proposal imaginable. Go try and water plan that.
*Raymond G. Sanchez
Recent Comments